The Critique of Politics #5: War and Peace in the Epoch of Conflicts
The Critique of Politics #5: War and
Peace in the Epoch of Conflicts
By Tim Krenz
February 4, 2019
Wars can start for many causes, even
sometimes for very flimsy excuses, or by pure accidents and perfect
political storms. Whatever the causes, wars bring serious, deadly
consequences. Even if a nation or groups of people find themselves
in technical conditions of peace—if the world ever can find a
state of balance for a peaceful international and domestic order—the
delicate fringe of terror will still overhang it. The existence and
constant proliferation, and the viable use policies, of nuclear
weapons threaten a self-destruction of the human species if, by
deliberate act or accident, such weapons ever get used.
One miscalculation in political
thinking, one willful and irresponsible decision by a leader, or one
murderous urge by a maniac with a grudge that unleashes the nuclear
genie from its bottle could end all human civilization. In the
extreme use and massive uses of them, almost every single living
plant and animal as we know them could cease to exist. With this
ultimate and terminal end-state in an escalation of nuclear combat—by
any combinations of those who possess them—the risk of war in our
age of conflict eventually concerns every woman, man and child living
and yet to come. Therefore, knowing this risk of catastrophe, this
fifth critique of politics focuses on war and peace, and the nature
of these dark and elusive monsters and angels of horrible fears and
false hopes. We should know and talk about modern conflict
intelligently because we have nothing at stake except everything on
earth.
Author Graham Allison coined a catchy
phrase two years ago with something known as the “Thucydides Trap,”
whereby a rising power challenges a declining power. Allison, though,
has only reinvented a strategic and historic wheel discovered 2,400
years ago by the ancient Greek writer and soldier, Thucydides. That
writer, Thucydides, the father of strategy, summed up the reasons by
which ancient Greece found itself in a war that lasted three decades,
changing Greece's history in disastrous ways. It comes down to a
simple thesis that because Athens grew ambitious to extend its power
over others, Sparta became fearful of its competitor. Underlying the
ambition and fear factors, we find a combination of both jealousy and
greed.
If we examine motives throughout
history since that war in late 5th Century B.C.E., the
cause of most conflicts fall within this greed, ambition, jealousy,
and fear cycle of human nature. Conflict and war itself goes beyond
the nice categories of national interests and so-called “strategic
calculus” (a non-sense buzz word of the self-appointed thinkers of
strategy—like me!). Conflict, armed and otherwise, comes out of the
very base human instincts, that when some player(s) on the
political-economic scene become(s) ambitious and/or greedy, the
others become fearful and/or jealous. This syndrome in a
political-economic system stems from the deeply rooted flaws in the
psyche of decision-makers. We cannot eliminate these defects. But, we
can understand them and limit the damage they do to ourselves and
others.
Consider the following example in the
current war of a Western civilization with the extremists leaders of
the radical Islamic states and para-military movements. Think about
this, seriously. If looked at in the ambition-greed vs. jealousy-fear
model, it fits as well as in almost every other armed conflict.
Understanding the war in this way can sort through the propaganda,
lies, distortions and half-truths of all sides. The Western nations
(and China, Russia, and Japan, and now India) rely on oil to fuel
their economies, and to maintain the comforts and securities provided
by their civilization. Those nations have a greed for keeping what
they have got and do not want to lose it and go backward. Oil, in
large measure, provided the convenience of living better the past one
hundred years.
To secure that oil, Western nations
co-opted the elite rulers of the oil-producing nations to continue to
supply that oil or maintain the security of its won (i.e. Soviet
Union/Russia). That co-optation includes allowing them to suppress
their poor people and the poor immigrants seeking employment. The
West, etc. provides the money for the elites and for the security of
their rule for Western access to the oil. Many of the co-opted
oil-producing nations have Muslim majority populations, primarily in
Southwest, Central and Southeast Asia. It also concerns regions on
the periphery, like Syria, and Russia (which itself has a large
Muslim population). Virtually none allow democracy or other basic
human or natural rights or follow patterns of Western-like rule of
law institutions. Because of the greed for the oil, the oil money,
the security, and the ambition for power, we must admit that the West
has imposed on a billion humans in Islamic countries a very
oppressive condition. Few citizens or leaders in the West will admit
this point publicly. Yet, the West needs the oil out of a greedy
sense of securing their way of life, to the detriment of a whole lot
of people.
Enter the leaders of the extremist,
para-military Islamic organizations. For whatever other reasons they
fight the West in a global campaign of guerrilla-terrorism, they use
the claim of Western exploitation, past and present colonialism, and
Western political and military policies as their primary weapon to
recruit and deploy their followers in acts of violence. Do they hate
the West for things other than economic—whether religious or
social, or cultural reasons? Only they can answer that. However, we
cannot deny their statements that they jealously guard their land,
people, resources, and beliefs from the ambitions of the West who
have thwarted their nationalist-like religious goals.
Those goals? To overthrow the elite
overlords empowered by the West, and to drive the Western countries
out of their area. Since this global conflicted between the Western
civilization and the Islamic radicals started in Iran in 1978-79
(and the taking of US diplomatic hostages), it has consumed far more
lives, property, money and safety than ever expected. People can try
to look farther back into history to try and believe that it somehow
means a war of good vs. evil since the advent of Islam in 622 A.C.E.
Realistically, the current conflict has waged now for around four
decades—between the West and revisionist Islam.
This sword, however, has two edges and
it cuts both ways. Looked at from its opposite side, the radical
Islamic paramilitaries and states challenge the Western interests in
its own security, moral and physical. The enemies of the West act
with an amount of greed and ambition in their own right, to deprive
the Western powers of their personal and material civilization.
Without judgment on either side, where both legitimately protect
themselves, the West reacts with its own brand of fear and jealousy.
Both sides use greed, ambition,
jealousy and fear to wage the open and hidden wars between them..
Unless we look at it intelligently, logically, in order to find
solutions, it could go on for a much longer time. This war will
inevitably draw in more of the world, and it could escalate. With
eight of the nine nuclear powers now directly or indirectly involved
in the Indian Ocean Basin, it could end badly. Enter China as a
rising power with the same competitive interests, and the
greed-ambition, jealousy-fear model engages another tripwire. We live
in the epoch of modern conflict: A world divided by people's greed
for more or fear of losing what they have. But we may have common
point for conflict resolution to get beyond this epoch, and to
survive as a species here on the planet and a home we call Earth.
The next critique of politics will
examine this point of departure, and explain more how understanding
and acting beyond these human instincts for these self-destructive
attitudes can lead to a better peace. If we do not, in the end, we
will only destroy all of the future, not just an enemy, but ourselves
as well.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home